Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination-deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: study protocol for cohort C of the open-label, phase 2, randomized controlled multicenter OPAL trial.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has been shown to extend progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of biomarker status. However, there are limited data on niraparib's efficacy and safety in the neoadjuvant setting. The objective of Cohort C of the OPAL trial (OPAL-C) is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of neoadjuvant niraparib treatment compared with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer with confirmed homologous recombination-deficient tumors. METHODS: OPAL is an ongoing global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. In OPAL-C, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive three 21-day cycles of either neoadjuvant niraparib or platinum-taxane doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy per standard of care. Patients with a complete or partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) will then undergo interval debulking surgery; patients with stable disease may proceed to interval debulking surgery or alternative therapy at the investigator's discretion. Patients with disease progression will exit the study treatment and proceed to alternative therapy at the investigator's discretion. After interval debulking surgery, all patients will receive up to three 21-day cycles of platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance therapy for up to 36 months. Adult patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer eligible to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery may be enrolled. Patients must have tumors that are homologous recombination-deficient. The primary endpoint is the pre-interval debulking surgery unconfirmed overall response rate, defined as the investigator-assessed percentage of patients with unconfirmed complete or partial response on study treatment before interval debulking surgery per RECIST v1.1. DISCUSSION: OPAL-C explores the use of niraparib in the neoadjuvant setting as an alternative to neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy to improve postsurgical residual disease outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer with homologous recombination-deficient tumors. Positive findings from this approach could significantly impact preoperative ovarian cancer therapy, particularly for patients who are ineligible for primary debulking surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574779. Registered on February 28, 2022.

Post-marketing safety concerns with palbociclib: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between palbociclib and related adverse events (AEs) in the real world through U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS: The signal strength of palbociclib-related AEs was done by disproportionality analysis. Clinical priority of palbociclib-related AEs was scored and ranked by assessing five different features. Outcome analysis, time to onset analysis, dose-report /AEs number analysis, and stratification analysis were all performed. RESULTS: There were 61,821 'primary suspected (PS)' reports of palbociclib and 195,616 AEs associated with palbociclib. The four algorithms simultaneously detected 18 positive signals at the SOC level, and 65 positive signals at the PT level. Bone marrow failure, neuropathy, peripheral, pleural effusion, myelosuppression, pulmonary edema, and pulmonary thrombosis were also found to have positive signals. Gender (female vs male, χ2 = 5.287, p = 0.022) and age showed significant differences in serious and non-serious reports. Palbociclib-related AEs had a median onset time of 79 days (interquartile range [IQR] 20-264 days). CONCLUSIONS: The study identified potential Palbociclib-related AEs and offered warnings for special AEs, providing further data for palbociclib safety studies in breast cancer patients. Nonetheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to validate these results and explain their relationship.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in children aged 2 years and older with virologically suppressed HIV: a phase 2/3, open-label, single-arm study.

BACKGROUND: Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide is a single-tablet regimen and was efficacious and well tolerated in children and adolescents with HIV (aged 6 years to <18 years) in a 48-week phase 2/3 trial. In this study, we report data from children aged at least 2 years and weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. METHODS: We conducted this open-label, multicentre, multicohort, single-arm study in South Africa, Thailand, Uganda, and the USA. Participants were virologically suppressed children with HIV, aged at least 2 years, weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. Participants received bictegravir (30 mg), emtricitabine (120 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (15 mg) once daily, switching to bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) upon attaining a bodyweight of at least 25 kg. The study included pharmacokinetic evaluation at week 2 to confirm the dose of coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide for this weight band by comparing with previous adult data. Primary outcomes were bictegravir area under the curve over the dosing interval (AUCtau) and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ctau) at week 2, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory abnormalities until the end of week 24 in all participants who received at least one dose of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02881320. FINDINGS: Overall, 22 participants were screened (from Nov 14, 2018, to Jan 11, 2020), completed treatment with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (until week 48), and entered an extension phase. The geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratio for AUCtau for bictegravir was 7·6% higher than adults (GLSM ratio 107·6%, 90% CI 96·7-119·7); Ctau was 34·6% lower than adults (65·4%, 49·1-87·2). Both parameters were within the target exposure range previously found in adults, children, or both". Grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities occurred in four (18%) participants by the end week 24 and six (27%) by the end of week 48. Drug-related adverse events occurred in three participants (14%) by the end of week 24 and week 48; none were severe. No Grade 3-4 adverse events, serious adverse events, or adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred by the end of week 24 and week 48. INTERPRETATION: Data support the use of single-tablet coformulated bictegravir (30 mg), emtricitabine (120 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (15 mg) for treatment of HIV in children aged at least 2 years and weighing 14 kg to less than 25 kg. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Role of adjunctive cariprazine for treatment-resistant depression in patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Cariprazine is an orally active dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 receptor and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, being considered as a treatment for refractory MDD. Therefore, we aim to perform the first meta-analysis of current literature, to collate changes in depression from baseline and assess tolerability of adjunctive cariprazine in MDD populace. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.Gov, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception till 1st September 2023. RCTs of adult patients with refractory MDD under adjunctive cariprazine vs. placebo were included. Primary outcomes included improvement in MADRS, CGI-S, and HAM-D 17 scores. Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events. The statistical analysis was performed using generic inverse variance with random-effects model. The overall risk ratios (RR) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: A total of five RCTs were analysed, enrolling 2013 participants (cariprazine: 959 participants, Placebo: 1054). Supplementation of ADT with cariprazine demonstrated a significant improvement in MADRAS, CGI-S and HAMD-17 scores from baseline (LSMD: -1.88, 95% CI [-2.94, -0.83], p=0.0005), (LSMD: -0.18, 95% CI [-0.29, -0.07], p=0.002), and (LSMD: -0.96, 95% CI [-1.70, -0.21], p=0.01) respectively. Treatment with adjunctive cariprazine therapy demonstrated significantly increased incidence of akathisia, nausea, dizziness, fatigue, restlessness, somnolence, and tremors when compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the efficacy of adjunctive cariprazine in patients with refractory MDD. However, it is essential to consider the safety profile of cariprazine, particularly the increased risk of adverse events. The vigilant monitoring and management of these side effects should be integrated into clinical practice to minimize discontinuation rates and optimize patient outcomes.

Assessment of the treatment effectiveness of men with mild and medium degree of erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: . Aim: To assess the effectiveness of monotherapy and complex treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction depending on its severity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: Men with moderate and mild erectile dysfunction took part in the study, who, in turn, were divided into groups, depending on the treatment, with the evaluation of the results of the International Index of Erectile Function (MIEF-15), the state of cavernous hemodynamics and the function of the vascular endothelium before and after treatment. RESULTS: Results: In patients with an average degree of severity, who received complex treatment including a course of low-energy shock wave therapy, against the background of taking sildenafil and L-arginine, the best results were obtained in the quality of erection and increased cavernous blood flow, which positively affected satisfaction with sexual intercourse and overall satisfaction. It has also been proven that the function of the endothelium was improved in patients receiving L-arginine, due to which there was a probable decrease in endothelin-1. A probable improvement of erectile function was obtained in the group of patients with a mild degree who received L-arginine, and there was no statistical difference from the indicators in the group who received sildenafil, which was confirmed by the data of dopplerography. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Patients with an average degree of erectile dysfunction require comprehensive treatment. The use of L-arginine can be an alternative to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of mild erectile dysfunction.

Adjunctive cariprazine as a novel effective strategy for treating major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cariprazine has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating bipolar depression and as an adjunctive treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). However, it remains unclear about its pharmacological efficacy in treating MDD. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the adjunctive use of cariprazine in MDD. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cariprazine in patients with MDD up to November 15, 2023. The changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score and incidence of adverse events (AEs), which represents of efficacy and tolerability, are considered as the main outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3066 patients with MDD included in all across 5 RCTs. With regard to MADRS score, cariprazine group showed better results than control group (SMD = -0.12, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.04, P = 0.002, 5 RCTs, n = 3066). Cariprazine, meanwhile, improved the MADRS response (RR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.31, P = 0.0004, 5 RCTs, n = 3066). For safety outcomes, statistical difference was observed in AEs (RR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.35, P < 0.00001, 5 RCTs, n = 3077). The suicide ideation and SAEs showed no statistical difference between two groups. CONCLUSION: Cariprazine demonstrated antidepressant effect as an augmentation therapy in treating MDD. Meanwhile, the tolerability of it was acceptable as an adjunctive treatment. However, studies with larger sample sizes are still needed to explore the optimal dosage.

Development of a simple high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection method for olaparib in patients with ovarian cancer.

Olaparib is a small-molecule inhibitor of poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) used as maintenance therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer and newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer after initial chemotherapy. An exposure-toxicity correlation has been reported between the probability of anemia, a common adverse event associated with olaparib, and the steady-state minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) as well as the predicted maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). On the other hand, olaparib exhibits high interpatient variability with regard to the area under the concentration-time curve, Cmax, and Cmin. Therefore, we developed a simple and sensitive assay based on high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet light (HPLC-UV) for the therapeutic drug monitoring of olaparib. The analysis was performed on an octadecylsilyl column with a mobile phase consisting of 0.5% KH2PO4 (pH 4.5) and acetonitrile (71:29, v/v), at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Olaparib and an internal standard (imatinib) were well separated from the co-extracted material, with retention times of 13.6 and 11.5 min, respectively. The calibration curve for olaparib showed linearity over the concentration range of 0.10-10.0 µg/mL (r2 = 0.9998). The intra- and inter- day validation coefficients ranged from 1.79 to 4.13% and 1.37 to 3.55%, respectively. Measurement accuracy ranged from - 6.07 to 3.26%, with a recovery rate of more than 91.06%. The developed method was then applied to evaluate the plasma olaparib concentrations in patients with ovarian cancer. Our findings demonstrate that HPLC-UV is an economical, simple, and sensitive method for clinical application and holds promise for the effective drug monitoring of olaparib during ovarian cancer treatment.

The prevalence of hepatic and thyroid toxicity associated with imatinib treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib, a potent inhibitor of targeted protein tyrosine kinases, treats chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Data on imatinib-associated changes in hepatic and thyroid functions are limited and conflicting. AIM: To report the prevalence of hepatic and thyroid toxicity associated with the use of imatinib in CML patients. METHOD: Articles for the systematic review were selected from electronic databases (PubMed, CINALH, Web of Science). Readily accessible peer-reviewed full articles in English published 1st January 2000 to 18th July 2023 were included. The search terms included combinations of: imatinib, CML, liver toxicity, hepatic toxicity, thyroid toxicity. Screening of titles, abstracts, full text articles was conducted independently by two reviewers. Inclusions and exclusions were recorded following PRISMA guidelines. Detailed reasons for exclusion were recorded. Included articles were critically appraised. RESULTS: Ten thousand one hundred and twenty-three CML patients were reported in the 82 included studies corresponding to 21 case reports, 2 case series, 39 clinical trials and 20 observational studies were selected. Excluding case studies/reports, 1268 (12.6%; n = 1268/10046) hepatotoxicity adverse events were reported, of which 64.7% were rated as mild grade I & II adverse events, 363 (28.6%) as severe, grade III and IV adverse events; some led to treatment discontinuation, liver transplantation and fatal consequences. Twenty (35.1%) studies reported discontinuation of imatinib treatment due to the severity of hepatic toxicity. Fourteen (8.4%, n = 14/167) thyroid dysfunction adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: High frequency of mild and severe hepatotoxicity, associated with imatinib in CML patients, was reported in the published literature. Low numbers of mild and manageable thyroid toxicity events were reported.

Olaparib maintenance versus placebo in platinum-sensitive non-small cell lung cancer: the Phase 2 randomized PIPSeN trial.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-sensitivity is a phenotypic biomarker of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) sensitivity in histotypes where PARPi are approved. Approximately one-third of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are platinum-sensitive. The double-blind, randomized phase II PIPSeN (NCT02679963) study evaluated olaparib, a PARPi, as maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Chemonaïve patients with ECOG performance status of 0-1, platinum-sensitive, EGFR- and ALK-wild-type, stage IIIB-IV NSCLC were randomized (R) to receive either olaparib (O) maintenance or a placebo (P). The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS) from R. Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS) and safety. With an anticipated hazard ratio of 0.65, 144 patients were required to be randomized, and approximately 500 patients enrolled. RESULTS: The trial was prematurely terminated because anti-PD(L)1 therapy was approved during the trial recruitment. A total of 182 patients were enrolled, with 60 patients randomized: 33 and 27 in the O and P arms, respectively. Patient and tumor characteristics were well-balanced between arms, except for alcohol intake (33% vs 11% in the O and P arms, respectively, p = 0.043). The median PFS was 2.9 and 2.0 months in the O and P arms, respectively (logrank p = 0.99). The median OS was 9.4 and 9.5 months in the O and P arms, respectively (p = 0.28). Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 15 and 8 patients in O and P arms, with no new safety concerns. CONCLUSION: PIPSeN was terminated early after enrollment of only 50% of the pre-planned population, thus being statistically underpowered. Olaparib maintenance did neither improve median PFS nor OS in this patient population.

Real-world outcomes of patients with metastatic endocrine-responsive breast cancer receiving palbociclib-based combinations.

Aim: To describe treatment journey and clinical outcomes after palbociclib initiation in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients across multiple lines. Materials & methods: Adult patients (n = 559) were identified in a population-based study between January 2018 and June 2020. Results: Median follow-up time was 41.2 months. The starting dose was 125 mg for more than 85% of patients, and a third had dose reduction. Median time on treatment was 30.5 months for palbociclib + aromatase inhibitors for patients that received first-line treatment after metastatic diagnosis, and 12.6 months for palbociclib + fulvestrant across multiple lines, and longer for patients that had a dose reduction during treatment. At 48 months, 59.3 and 27.3% of patients were still alive, respectively. Subsequent lines resulted in median time on treatment of 4.4-7.7 months in both groups. Conclusion: Time on treatment for palbociclib was comparable to data from clinical trials, and follow-up allowed us to examine subsequent treatment after initial treatment failure. Dose reduction was common in the real-world setting and did not adversely affect efficacy.

We used healthcare data from Israel to study the outcomes of adults (mostly women) who had breast cancer that spread (metastatic) and who started treatment with anticancer medications in the form of palbociclib in combination with either aromatase inhibitors (as first treatment after metastatic disease diagnosis) or fulvestrant (after having been treated with a different medication) between January 2018 and June 2020. Patients treated with palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors (52%) were on average 63 years old, and most had medium to high socioeconomic status (63%) and functioned independently (60%). Patients were treated on average for 30.5 months, and just over a third switched to a different treatment after their disease worsened. Four years after starting treatment, 59% of patients were still alive. Patients treated with palbociclib and fulvestrant, after having been treated with a different medication (48%), were on average 66 years old, and 61% had medium to high socioeconomic status and 50% functioned independently. These patients were treated on average for 12.6 months, and over two-thirds switched to a new treatment. Four years after starting this treatment, 27% of patients were still alive. Overall, most patients included in this study started treatment with the recommended dose of palbociclib (125 mg), and a third had to change to a lower dose to continue treatment (probably due to side effects). Clinical trial registration: NCT04671615 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Evaluation of the efficiency and safety of the dispersed form of sildenafil (50 mg) in males with erectile dysfunction].

INTRODUCTION: The erectile dysfunction is defined as an inability to achieve or maintain an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse lasting more than 3 months. According to literature, about 90 million men worldwide suffer from erectile dysfunction of different severity. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the dispersed form of sildenafil ("Ridzhamp" 50 mg), compared with the standard tablets of sildenafil (50 mg). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 60 men aged 27 to 67 years (average age 40.2 years) with moderate erectile dysfunction (11-15 points according to IIEF-5). In group I (n=30), patients took a dispersible form of the drug sildenafil, 50 mg ("Ridzhamp") 60 minutes before sexual intercourse; in group II (n=30), a standard form of the drug sildenafil was prescribed at a dosage of 50 mg, 60 minutes before sexual intercourse. RESULTS: Positive dynamics according to IIEF-5 score was found in all the study groups. In group I, IIEF-5 score increase by 53.85%, while in group II by 50% (p<0.05). The average onset of erection in group I was 45+/-2.2 min, while in group II it was 51+/-1.9 min. In the main group (group I) one patient (3.33%) complained of persistent headache after taking the drug, and therefore refused the therapy. In the comparison group (group II) one patient (3.33%) reported dyspeptic disorders while taking the drug, 1 patient (3.33%) reported dizziness. All patients in the main group noted the convenience of taking the "Ridzhamp". CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the comparable efficiency of the dispersed form of sildenafil (group I) and the standard tablet form of the drug (group II). All patients in the main group (group I) noted a faster onset of erections, as well as the convenience of "Ridzhamp" and the ability to take the drug without water intake.

Therapeutic Appropriateness of Cariprazine in the Management of Schizophrenia: Experts' Opinion using a Delphi Approach.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a psychiatric disorder whose therapeutic objectives are aimed at reducing symptoms and improving patient's quality of life. First- and second-generation antipsychotics present numerous side effects. Recently introduced in the treatment of schizophrenia, cariprazine has shown to improve positive and negative symptoms as well as cognitive impairment, with good tolerability. OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of consensus among Italian psychiatrists in relation to the use of cariprazine in the treatment of schizophrenia by using the Delphi technique. METHOD: A Delphi study was undertaken between January and July 2022. Two questionnaires were consecutively sent to a panel of 97 psychiatrists from all over Italy, of which 81 actively participated, anonymously, in at least one of the two consultations with a sufficiently high response rate (83%). RESULTS: Broad consensus in terms of the efficacy and safety of cariprazine in the treatment of schizophrenia during all phases of the disorder. The young first-episode schizophrenia patient with or without substance abuse seems to be an excellent candidate for cariprazine therapy. In addition, the lack of side effects makes cariprazine a suitable drug for adult and elderly patients with schizophrenia. However, there is still limited experience with the use of cariprazine, along with little knowledge of the most recent real-life data. CONCLUSION: These results could encourage wider dissemination of evidence-based practices with the final aim of optimizing the clinical use of cariprazine in patients with schizophrenia.

Does drug use affect the efficacy of amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders? Results from a pragmatic, randomised study.

OBJECTIVES: Drug use is prevalent in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) but there is limited knowledge about the influence of drug use on the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication. This secondary explorative study compared the effectiveness of three antipsychotics in patients with SSD, with and without drug use. METHODS: The BeSt InTro multi-centre, head to head, rater-blinded randomised study compared amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine over a 1-year follow-up period. All patients (n = 144) were aged ≥18 years and met the ICD-10 criteria for SSD (F20-29). Clinical symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The primary outcome was reduction of a PANSS positive subscale score. RESULTS: At baseline, 38% of all patients reported drug use in the last 6 months before inclusion, with cannabis as the main drug (85%), followed by amphetamine-type stimulants (45%), sedatives (26%), hallucinogens (19%), cocaine (13%), opiates (4%), GHB (4%), solvents (4%), analgesics (4%) and anabolic steroids (2%). The predominant pattern was the use of several drugs. There were no significant overall differences in the PANSS positive subscale score reduction for the three studied antipsychotics among patients either with or without drug use. In the drug use group, older patients treated with amisulpride showed a greater PANSS positive subscale score reduction during the treatment period compared to younger patients. CONCLUSION: The current study showed that drug use does not appear to affect the overall effectiveness of amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine in patients with SSD. However, amisulpride may be a particularly suitable choice for older patients with drug use.

Effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and early-stage dementia: The MEMORY study.

BACKGROUND: Depression and dementia are highly prevalent in older adults and often co-occur. This Phase IV study investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine in improving depressive symptoms, cognitive performance, daily and global functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid early-stage dementia. METHODS: Patients (n = 82) aged 55-85 years with a primary diagnosis of MDD (onset before age 55 years) and comorbid early-stage dementia (diagnosed ≥6 months before screening and after onset of MDD; Mini-Mental State Examination-2 total score, 20-24) received vortioxetine for 12 weeks (initiated at 5 mg/day and up-titrated to 10 mg/day at day 8, with flexible dosing thereafter [5-20 mg/day]). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week 12. RESULTS: Significant improvement in depressive symptom severity was seen from week 1 onwards (P < 0.0001). At week 12, the least-square mean (standard error) change in MADRS total score from baseline was -12.4 (0.78). Significant improvements in cognitive performance were observed (from week 1 for the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and week 4 for the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test). Patients also experienced significant improvements in daily and global functioning, and HRQoL. Vortioxetine was well tolerated. From week 4 onwards, more than 50 % of patients were receiving 20 mg/day. LIMITATIONS: Open-label study. CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine demonstrated effectiveness in clinically significantly improving depressive symptoms, cognitive performance, daily and global functioning, and HRQoL in patients with MDD and comorbid early-stage dementia treated for 12 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04294654.